<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Galileo: EMF-Databinding &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2009/06/06/galileo-emf-databinding-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2009/06/06/galileo-emf-databinding-part-1/</link>
	<description>Tom&#039;s opensource development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:05:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 common EMF mistakes &#171; Nirmal&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2009/06/06/galileo-emf-databinding-part-1/#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10 common EMF mistakes &#171; Nirmal&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomsondev.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-2930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Although, you could go ahead and implement your custom viewers, the easier way would be to use EMF Databinding. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Although, you could go ahead and implement your custom viewers, the easier way would be to use EMF Databinding. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010 in review &#171; Tomsondev Blog</title>
		<link>http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2009/06/06/galileo-emf-databinding-part-1/#comment-2625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2010 in review &#171; Tomsondev Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomsondev.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-2625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Galileo: EMF-Databinding &#8211; Part 1 June 20093 comments  5 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Galileo: EMF-Databinding &#8211; Part 1 June 20093 comments  5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomeclipsedev</title>
		<link>http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2009/06/06/galileo-emf-databinding-part-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tomeclipsedev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomsondev.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I already thought about it - the main problem is that there&#039;s no event when reparenting elements IIRC but we could definately take a look at this in 2.6 to see if we can provide such a feature.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already thought about it &#8211; the main problem is that there&#8217;s no event when reparenting elements IIRC but we could definately take a look at this in 2.6 to see if we can provide such a feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Scharf</title>
		<link>http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2009/06/06/galileo-emf-databinding-part-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Scharf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomsondev.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tom,

great work! I like the example.

You say &quot;there’s no feature you can use to navigate from child to container but only the call to the method eContainer&quot;. Wouldn&#039;t it make sense to add support for this to the EMF data binding?

Michael]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>great work! I like the example.</p>
<p>You say &#8220;there’s no feature you can use to navigate from child to container but only the call to the method eContainer&#8221;. Wouldn&#8217;t it make sense to add support for this to the EMF data binding?</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galileo: Improved EMF-Databinding-Support &#171; Tomsondev Blog</title>
		<link>http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2009/06/06/galileo-emf-databinding-part-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galileo: Improved EMF-Databinding-Support &#171; Tomsondev Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomsondev.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part 1: Create the Domain-Model [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 1: Create the Domain-Model [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

